On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 04:12, Listman <listman_at_burble.net> wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2009, at 10:01 AM- Sep 12, 2009, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>> So I would fully understand your complaints if work on WC-NG was dormant
>> or slow because people didn't work on it that much.
>> But it isn't, far from it. Those who do work on it are already working
>> so frantically, it does not surprise me that asking for quicker progress
>> without offering any kind of help is perceived as insulting.
>
> You're right, I haven't submitted any patches but I don't think responding
> with
> the old "What have you done for me lately" argument is helpful at all.
>
> I care about Subversion and I want to see the improvements wc_ng has
> promised, when things start to go off-track its needs to be discussed.
Things have not gone "off-track" at all. This stage of development has
been anticipated since day one, tho we had hoped to cross it sooner.
Perf is off, yet we expect huge wins *later*.
Within this context, you're not providing new/informative data, yet
still ragging on the developers. How do you expect us to take that?
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2393820
Received on 2009-09-12 10:42:38 CEST