[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [patch submission] gen-make: Option to statically link APR.

From: D.J. Heap <djheap_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:21:46 -0600

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Robert Dailey<rcdailey_at_gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> For my purposes, static libs are fine because I have no requirements that
> would prevent me from using them. Why bother with extra files to keep track
> of when you don't have to?

I won't get into all the details of the pros/cons of both...there are
tradeoffs to either way (and plenty of discussions on their merits all
over the internet). Personally, after 20+ years of programming, I
almost always (but not always) prefer dynamic libraries.

But if static fits your situation better, then use it.

DJ

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2391377
Received on 2009-09-06 00:22:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.