[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: replace conflict permutations

From: Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <neels_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:07:11 +0200

Julian Foad wrote:
> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> [...]
>> But you're right, should be ok to test that separately. It still gives me a
>> sense of uncertainty. To be sure, we should actually test every single
>> variant on its own. But we won't since it's not practical. Fine.
>
> It's quite practical for you and me to test a thousand combinations
> every now and then. It's just not practical to include them all in the
> regular regression tests. It would be good to have a test that is
> capable of systematically testing all combinations, and we can run it
> occasionally by special command. When the regression test suite runs
> normally, it should test just a few of the combinations.

Yes, that sounds good.

~Neels

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2387231

Received on 2009-08-26 23:58:25 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.