On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Blair Zajac<blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Hyrum K. Wright<hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: hwright
>>>>> Date: Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>>>>> New Revision: 38268
>>>>>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Update the dav server survey for July 2009.
>>>>>
>>>>> * www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html,
>>>>> Â www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png,
>>>>> Â tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py:
>>>>> Â Update image and table.
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> Â trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>>>>> Â trunk/www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png
>>>>> Â trunk/www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py?pathrev=38268&r1=38267&r2=38268
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =
>>>>> =====================================================================
>>>>> --- trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py   Tue Jun 30 07:10:17 2009
>>>>> (r38267)
>>>>> +++ trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py   Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>>>>> (r38268)
>>>>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ STATS = [
>>>>> Â ('4/1/2009', 408658),
>>>>> Â ('5/1/2009', 407044),
>>>>> Â ('6/1/2009', 406520),
>>>>> + Â ('7/1/2009', 334276),
>>>>
>>>> Ouch. Â Any idea what happened here?
>>>
>>> Not really. Â These are the numbers I got from SecuritySpace:
>>>
>>> Date         Count  % Share  %Growth
>>> ============== Â ========= ===================
>>> Jun 2009 Â Â Â Â Â 334276 Â Â Â 1.23 Â Â -21.37
>>> May 2009 Â Â Â Â Â 406520 Â Â Â 1.56 Â Â Â 1.00
>>> Apr 2009 Â Â Â Â Â 407044 Â Â Â 1.55 Â Â Â 2.03
>>> Mar 2009 Â Â Â Â Â 408658 Â Â Â 1.52 Â Â Â 3.42
>>> Feb 2009 Â Â Â Â Â 390502 Â Â Â 1.47 Â Â Â 3.47
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I seriously doubt that 1 in 5 public Subversion servers went dark in
>>> one month. Â I guess it was something to do with their research
>>> methodology, but there's no way to be sure.
>>>
>> Many customers of VisualSVN Server asked to remove information about
>> Apache version and loaded modules from server response. Probably
>> people also do this of their custom Apache/Subversion servers.
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> Thanks, that's good to know.
>
> On a totally different note, are there any plans to offer an upgraded Trac
> integration with VisualSVN?
Yes, we're going to upgrade Trac soon. We're just waiting for other
developers to vote for backport :)
--
Ivan Zhakov
VisualSVN Team
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2366936
Received on 2009-07-01 08:34:53 CEST