[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Memory leak with 1.6.x clients

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:12:25 -0400

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> This makes the commit I/O bound and slows it down quite a bit -- the
>> total number of failed attempts being ((N(N+1)/2)-1) -- I'll look into
>> speeding this up...
>
> This sounds horrid. I think we've had reports about commit being much
> slower in 1.6 too. And getting slower as the number of files goes up.
>
> Is this fixable?

We could use tempfile names that match the name of the to-be-committed file,
instead of having them all be generic tempfile.N type names. That would
reduce name clashes.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2356927

Received on 2009-05-29 21:12:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.