[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Memory leak with 1.6.x clients

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:47:36 +0100

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 06:27:50PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > If so, that's really bad. There were memory-related fixes for merge
> > going into 1.6.2, but apparently they haven't fixed the problem you
> > are seeing.
> Let's not try to blame every problem on merge please? The reporter
> has clearly indicated that the problem happens during commit. Commit
> is commit, it does not matter if your working copy was edited by a
> merge, a script or manual labor.

Yes, that is true. It explains why the memory-related fixes for merge
have nothing to do with it, which my quirky thinking failed to explain,
before your comment.

Received on 2009-05-21 00:48:04 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.