Re: [RFC] svn patch --patch-cmd

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 14:55, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:37:44AM +0200, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> --editor-cmd should be removed. I have no idea what that is, and it is
>>> not used anyways.
>>
>> It's probably the editor to be used when picking the (e)dit option
>> during interactive conflict resolution?
>
> "... it is not used ..."
>
> So, no. It is NOT used for interactive conflict resolution.
>
> Torch the sucker. It isn't used. Dunno what it is for. Nobody has said
> what it is for. Bye bye.

Uh, isn't it an ancient argument that is (along with
.subversion/config, $EDITOR, etc) used to select an editor for commit
messages and stuff? Are we just randomly deleting options that we
don't like these days without regards to backwards compatibility?

--dave

-- 
glasser_at_davidglasser.net | langtonlabs.org | flickr.com/photos/glasser/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1965856