I think you're right -- I think a bunch of TSVN traffic is buried in
that 'cmdline' statistic. Is there any way to distinguish svn 1.4.x
from tsvn 1.4.x?
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> googlecode gets a huge amount of svn traffic. I was looking at log
>> statistics, specifically at aggregated user-agent: strings. Here's
>> the relative popularity of different svn clients:
>>
>>
>> cmdline 65%
>> SvnKit 15%
>> Tortoise 8%
>> SharpSvn 1%
>> other 11% (too many useragent micro-variants to count)
>>
>> cmdline breakdown:
>>
>> 1.6.x 5%
>> 1.5.x 50%
>> 1.4.x 30%
>> older 15%
>
> Ben, since 45% of clients are older than 1.5.x, are the stats for the
> different clients over all versions or just the >= 1.5.x clients?
> It's because svn only offers customizing the user agent string since
> 1.5.0 - for earlier versions all clients would show up as 'cmdline' (not
> sure about SvnKit - I think they might have used their own string even
> before 1.5.0).
>
> If it's for all versions, then the client stats are a little bit skewed...
>
> Stefan
>
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
>
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1816065
Received on 2009-04-20 03:42:03 CEST