Re: Minor feature request: --dry-run for update

svn st -u only tells what would happen if you ran exactly "svn up"; without
making the status CLI way uglier than the "svn up --dry-run" proposal, it's
not going to tell you what would happen with a more complicated update
command (with -r, --depth, etc).

--dave

On Mar 19, 2009 5:55 PM, "Greg Stein" <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:

"svn st --show-updates" is what you're asking for. I really don't
understand why that doesn't work.

Why introduce a new concept? (ie. dry run on an update)

Cheers,
-g

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 00:57, Scott Palmer <swpalmer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The more I think about it, --dry-run on update seems to be the right place
> for this. Merge and update are essentially the same operations - just the
> source of the incoming changes are different.
>
> Scott

> > On 19-Mar-09, at 10:50 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote: >
>> So I assume you mean s...
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1359505

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1365126
Received on 2009-03-20 16:03:20 CET