[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Minor feature request: --dry-run for update

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:54:59 +0100

"svn st --show-updates" is what you're asking for. I really don't
understand why that doesn't work.

Why introduce a new concept? (ie. dry run on an update)

Cheers,
-g

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 00:57, Scott Palmer <swpalmer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The more I think about it, --dry-run on update seems to be the right place
> for this. Merge and update are essentially the same operations - just the
> source of the incoming changes are different.
>
> Scott
>
> On 19-Mar-09, at 10:50 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So I assume you mean svn st -u would be updated to indicate a conflict
>> would occur?  It does not currently have the incoming changes
>> available to know that.  Of course update can only produce a conflict
>> if there are local modifications, so a "poor man's" version can be
>> made with the current output by looking for incoming changes where
>> there are also local mods.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd counter and say that 'svn status -u' (aka --show-updates) should
>>> learn to do that. No reason to add more switches :-)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 01:03, Scott Palmer <swpalmer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Analogous to the --dry-run option for merge, having the same option
>>>> for update would allow scripts and tools to test for incoming changes
>>>> (similar to the eighth column in 'status') and detect when conflicts
>>>> would happen, without introducing the conflicts into the working
>>>> copy.   This offers a means to give you a 'heads up' to potential
>>>> problems and yet not force you to deal with conflict resolution
>>>> immediately like a "real" update would.
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1351549
>>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1355713
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mark Phippard
>> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1359505
Received on 2009-03-20 01:55:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.