[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of outstanding branches

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:50:12 -0500

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>>> * reduce-wc-walks-for-mergeinfo/
>>> Five months old, managed by Paul.
>> This branch has reduced expectations from what I originally hoped
>> (i.e. we don't walk the WC multiple times in as many cases as I
>> originally thought). But there still is a benefit to be had in some
>> circumstances and I do hope to get back to it at some point in the
>> next few months, so if it's not a problem I'm leaving it for now.
> Centralization of WC metadata should significantly simplify collection
> of mergeinfo. Assuming the next generation of WC provides this data, I
> expect it would make sense to focus 1.7+-timeframe efforts on
> leveraging wc_ng rather than dealing with WC walks.

Hi Dan, (He lives!)

You are right, I wasn't thinking about wcng's impact on this.

I'll delete this branch.


Received on 2009-02-20 21:50:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.