[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of outstanding branches

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:24:39 -0800

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
...
>> * reduce-wc-walks-for-mergeinfo/
>> Five months old, managed by Paul.
>
> This branch has reduced expectations from what I originally hoped
> (i.e. we don't walk the WC multiple times in as many cases as I
> originally thought). But there still is a benefit to be had in some
> circumstances and I do hope to get back to it at some point in the
> next few months, so if it's not a problem I'm leaving it for now.

Centralization of WC metadata should significantly simplify collection
of mergeinfo. Assuming the next generation of WC provides this data, I
expect it would make sense to focus 1.7+-timeframe efforts on
leveraging wc_ng rather than dealing with WC walks.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1189481
Received on 2009-02-19 03:25:15 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.