Yes, I'm definitely claiming #3, but would like help with #1. I added
that stuff, so feel a bit responsible, but would be happy if somebody
could help.
Note: I don't think the branch needs to be held for #3, as I believe
it is mostly doc changes, and some small-ish config changes.
Cheers,
-g
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:56, "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu
> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> This mail was going to be about a new branch date for 1.6.x, but I
>> noticed that
>> there are still a few items labeled "Blocker" in TODO-1.6. They
>> are reproduced
>> below:
> ...
>
> It looks like we're making good progress on the items in TODO-1.6,
> with all the
> items either completed or claimed. They currently are:
>
> * Actually document how to build with SQLite (ie, make the part in
> INSTALL not blank, explain how to build against a newer version
> of SQLite than what may be installed in your system, figure out
> if the text in sqlite.m4 about being able to use a sqlite/
> subdirectory is in any way true, etc etc)
>
> * Tree conflicts - essential issues:
>
> - #3334: "Merry-go-round" about update updating the base.
>
> * Switch to skel for TC information, rather than using another
> serialization format.
>
> I think Greg has the first and third items, and Julian the second.
> Do we have
> an ETA for completion of this items? Do we think that a Friday
> branch is still
> workable?
>
> Thanks,
> -Hyrum
>
> PS - I seem to recall some problems with various bindings tests. If
> these
> problems exist, we should probably get them into TODO-1.6 so that
> they are
> tracked as blockers for branch.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=982391
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=982633
Received on 2008-12-11 02:18:23 CET