[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: tree-conflicts tests pass to leniently

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:35:59 +0000

Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:31:50AM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > We are still expecting stuff in the update, switch and merge tree-conflicts
> > tests to pass that is obviously not correct, and we know it. We want a
> > tree-conflict to appear on every D1 node in those tests, and some still
> > don't show it because we can't compare an arbitrary repos URL_at_REV against
> > the local working copy with mods (aka diff --summarize). We're just playing
> > along and PASSing the nonsense current behaviour.
> >
> > This was convenient in the developing phase, but now that we're about to
> > branch 1.6, it would be good to XFAIL these tests to clearly mark spec
> > violations. Good?
> I don't see why not.

+1 on Neels' changes that do this (r34454). Thanks.

- Julian

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-28 23:49:53 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.