[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: tree-conflicts tests pass to leniently

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:33:06 +0000

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:31:50AM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> We are still expecting stuff in the update, switch and merge tree-conflicts
> tests to pass that is obviously not correct, and we know it. We want a
> tree-conflict to appear on every D1 node in those tests, and some still
> don't show it because we can't compare an arbitrary repos URL_at_REV against
> the local working copy with mods (aka diff --summarize). We're just playing
> along and PASSing the nonsense current behaviour.
> This was convenient in the developing phase, but now that we're about to
> branch 1.6, it would be good to XFAIL these tests to clearly mark spec
> violations. Good?

I don't see why not.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-26 19:33:22 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.