[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue #3322, branch tc_url_rev

From: Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:58:09 +0000

On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 05:53 +0100, Neels J. Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hey Julian,
> I'm getting the idea that we should rather report
> Older URL: (file) file://my/repos/trunk/foo_at_2
> Their URL: (dir) file://my/repos/branches/bar/foo_at_7
> When I'm going to *use* this information, I don't necessarily want it
> separated, but rather all in one so I can just copy-paste it. That would
> also make the documentation a lot simpler.

Yes, I was thinking that too. It seemed important to separate the repos
URL from the path-in-repos for storage (though I'm not 100% sure), and
it makes for neater output in some ways, but... yes, the most usable for
the command-line is a single URL_at_REV.

I will do that now.

- Julian

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-21 11:58:28 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.