[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Four failing tests on trunk with ra_serf.

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:45:26 -0500

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Julian Foad <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:
> As three of these are tree-conflict tests, and the other is in the same
> sort of area, I had that much of a look at the test log. The fact that
> it all works with Neon says to me that these are all bugs in (RA-)Serf.

In my experience, that is not usually a correct assumption - it could
often be that ra_neon is seeing the same issue but is hiding the
fundamental error in other ways.

Frankly, IMO, if you break the tests, you should fix the code. It's
not fair to have people say, "Oh, I broke the code and I won't bother
to fix it." That's not how I believe we should operate 'round here.
If you need help understanding the code, plenty of us are around to
assist - but if you are the one who breaks some code, you should make
a legitimate attempt to fix it. A lot of us put a lot of work to get
the code fully passing the regression tests - and to have folks
essentially say, "I broke the code and won't fix it" isn't respectful
neighborly behavior in my view.

My $.02. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-13 20:45:40 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.