[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn edit

From: Listman <listman_at_burble.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:29:45 -0700

On Oct 30, 2008, at 12:34 PM- Oct 30, 2008, Harvey, Edward wrote:

>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Branko ╚ibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
>>> Harvey, Edward wrote:
>>>> For a simple "find" I think this is typical performance:
>>>>
>>>> 100,000 files in 10 sec cold cache
>>>> 1,000,000 files in 3 sec warm cache.
>>>>
>>>> I think if this performance can be achieved for "svn st"
>> and "svn up" it's acceptable. I do, however, doubt being
>> able to achieve that while walking the tree with svn -
>> because git failed to achieve it.
>>>
>>> Oh I say, that's a truly obnoxious statement. Second of
>> all, a version
>>> control system has a lot more to do than a simple find. But
>> first of
>>> all, it implies that git is the unattainable grail of software
>>> perfection. Perish the thought.
>>
>> Brane: clearly you're both ugly and stupid. :-)
>
> Alright, let's just cool it everyone. There is a little bit of
> truth all around.

Don't worry, Sussman is just parodying Linus ;) FUNNY!
Received on 2008-10-31 05:30:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.