Hey windows folks,
I'm working on issue #2382 (Handle dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 servers in
svnserve) on the aptly named issue-2382 branch.
I'm trying to make svnserve listen on multiple sockets (an arbitrary
amount, actually), so instead of a single server socket, there is
now a list of sockets svnserve is listening on.
Addresses to listen on can be specified like this:
svnserve --listen localhost:5555 --listen svn.example.com:4242 \
--listen svn.example.com --listen ...
# ^ use default port
subversion/svnserve/main.c contains the following snippet:
--- snip ---
static apr_os_sock_t winservice_svnserve_accept_socket = INVALID_SOCKET;
/* The SCM calls this function (on an arbitrary thread, not the main()
thread!) when it wants to stop the service.
For now, our strategy is to close the listener socket, in order to
unblock main() and cause it to exit its accept loop. We cannot use
apr_socket_close, because that function deletes the apr_socket_t
structure, as well as closing the socket handle. If we called
apr_socket_close here, then main() will also call apr_socket_close,
resulting in a double-free. This way, we just close the kernel
socket handle, which causes the accept() function call to fail,
which causes main() to clean up the socket. So, memory gets freed
This isn't pretty, but it's better than a lot of other options.
Currently, there is no "right" way to shut down svnserve.
We store the OS handle rather than a pointer to the apr_socket_t
structure in order to eliminate any possibility of illegal memory
if (winservice_svnserve_accept_socket != INVALID_SOCKET)
#endif /* _WIN32 */
--- snap ---
and further below we have this call:
--- snip ---
status = apr_os_sock_get(&winservice_svnserve_accept_socket, sock);
winservice_svnserve_accept_socket = INVALID_SOCKET;
/* At this point, the service is "running". Notify the SCM. */
if (run_mode == run_mode_service)
--- snip ---
My question is, does it matter which socket is passed as the 'sock'
parameter to apr_os_sock_get? Is a socket of the same type (ie. streamy)
sufficient or should I pass the *exact* same socket in there that we are
listening on (i.e. call apr_os_sock_get once for each socket)?
And must I take special care to make this thread-safe?
Can anyone firm in windows provide comments (and hopefully also test
later, once the branch is done)?
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-19 18:06:55 CEST