[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: current plan for WC

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:46:31 -0700

Sorry, but I keep seeing red flags being raised rather than better
solutions or alternatives. I feel like I'm "justifying" my sequence of
development, rather than having a technical discussion around
improvements to the design and concepts. And it is making me real
cranky.

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> The buildability of SQLite on Windows is NOT a concern.
>>
>> We are going to be using SQLite. Period. Therefore, it will need to be
>> a dependency, and it will need to be figured out.
>>
>> "Don't do it in 1.6" implies "Do it in 1.7" which is just *deferring*
>> the problem. It is not SOLVING the problem.
>>
>> Now. If you want to dispute the use of SQLite, then please do so. By all means.
>>
>> Until that discussion, we are going to use it, and that means adding
>> it as a dependency of Subversion.
>
> Chill out. No one is suggesting any such thing. I did raise one
> issue earlier and that was the version you are requiring and whether
> that could be a concern. And my only point there was, why not
> consider the "include single file" approach and build it into our
> library.
>
> What you chose to comment on was just a side discussion on the Windows
> build process. We build SVN 1.5 for months with SQLite included,
> doing so again is not a problem in and of itself.
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-02 19:47:22 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.