[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: current plan for WC

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:08:51 -0400

Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Re-reading your original email...
>>
>> The new API allows for compressing the text base files. Pretty much
>> transparently. So yah... there could be improvements.
>>
>> But I still maintain that it doesn't matter. 1.6 comes with a lot of
>> improvements, and it needs sqlite.
>
> Could "entries" be moved to sqlite for 1.6? Too much work? Seems
> like that would yield an improvement.

Would it? Don't we keep entries in memory most of the time, attached to the
adm_access batons?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-10-02 19:09:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.