[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: current plan for WC

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:14:10 -0400

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:08 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Re-reading your original email...
>>> The new API allows for compressing the text base files. Pretty much
>>> transparently. So yah... there could be improvements.
>>> But I still maintain that it doesn't matter. 1.6 comes with a lot of
>>> improvements, and it needs sqlite.
>> Could "entries" be moved to sqlite for 1.6? Too much work? Seems
>> like that would yield an improvement.
> Would it? Don't we keep entries in memory most of the time, attached to the
> adm_access batons?

Wouldn't issues like SVN connection timing out why we rewrite a large
entries file go away if each "entry" is just a row in a table?

Mark Phippard
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-02 19:14:42 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.