[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r33366 - trunk/notes

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:43:41 -0700

I think that most cases would simply use 2 repository paths, rather
than 2 URLs. You could have the target of the operation as the main
URL path, and the supporting URL converted to a repository-relative
path.

One day, if we ever do cross-repository work from the server side,
then yes... you'd bury the two URLs into the body of a POST.

Cheers,
-g

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Ben Collins-Sussman
> <sussman_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually, gstein just persuaded me (in IRC) to never have a &path
>> query parameter -- it's too weird and "un-URL-ish".
>
> Would requests that need 2 URL's use POST?
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Mark Phippard
> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-10-02 00:43:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.