[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: svn revision r0 question

From: Paul Charlton <techguru_at_byiq.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:24:33 -0700


"{2007-01-02}" is inherently a set, with zero or more members. It can never
deterministically resolve to a single revision number in the case that there
is more than one transaction commit during a 24 hour period beginning at
midnight unless you arbitrarily pick "first commit that day" or "last commit
that day".


-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson_at_MIT.EDU]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 1:10 PM
To: Paul Charlton
Cc: 'Subversion Developers'
Subject: RE: svn revision r0 question

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 13:04 -0700, Paul Charlton wrote:
> I respectfully disagree that the phrase {2007-01-02} has no meaning. It
> defines a set of all revisions matching that date ... there is no
> requirement that the initial set be ordered to determine membership in the
> named subset .... that's why all relationship DBMS have the ability to
> create an index on the fly of most any field of a collection of records.

You've departed from our API and command-line interface specifications
with that meaning. Revision specs must resolve into a single revision

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-29 23:24:44 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.