RE: svn revision r0 question

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 13:04 -0700, Paul Charlton wrote:
> I respectfully disagree that the phrase {2007-01-02} has no meaning. It
> defines a set of all revisions matching that date ... there is no
> requirement that the initial set be ordered to determine membership in the
> named subset .... that's why all relationship DBMS have the ability to
> create an index on the fly of most any field of a collection of records.

You've departed from our API and command-line interface specifications
with that meaning. Revision specs must resolve into a single revision
number.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-29 22:10:28 CEST