Re: svn revision r0 question

Blair Zajac wrote:
> I'm not saying people can't modify it, that's fine, I'm saying, why are
> we allowing people to remove it? There's a lot of tools that presume
> the existence of svn:date.

I think we can pretty much guarantee that every tool that presumes the
existence of svn:date was conceived and composed after svn:date -- by virtue
of being implemented as a mutable, unversioned revision property -- was made
optional. This project needn't bear the responsibility for decisions made
by others who weren't diligent enough to check their assumptions against
reality.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand