[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn revision r0 question

From: Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:16:07 -0700

I'm not saying people can't modify it, that's fine, I'm saying, why are we
allowing people to remove it? There's a lot of tools that presume the existence
of svn:date.


Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Because we treat svn sysadmins as adults. It's their metadata, they can
> do what they want with it.
> In this case, modifying svn:date isn't always a case of shooting
> onesself in the foot; in fact it's a requirement for svnsync!
> On Sep 27, 2008 12:09 PM, "Blair Zajac" <blair_at_orcaware.com
> <mailto:blair_at_orcaware.com>> wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:49 AM,
> Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu <mailto:brane_at_xbc.nu>> wrote: >...
> Why would we ever allow svn:date to be removed?
> Blair

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-27 21:16:34 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.