Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Allow any Neon version from specified branches

Greg Stein wrote on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 at 21:37 -0700:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org> wrote:
> > [Greg Stein]
> >> [please review the PATCH mail submission guidelines in hacking.html;
> >> it was very difficult to review your patch as emailed]
> >

Incredibly non-specific :)

As far as I know, Arfrever did follow the patch submission guidelines.
Yes, the log message and the patch were separated (one inline and one
attached), which makes review harder, but that's about the only thing
I can think of. (The patch even included the 'diff -p' headers, that
most patches don't have.)

> > Shrug - it came through my MUA inline.
>
> Not all MUAs do, which is why we established some guides. When it
> becomes hard to read, then people simply don't. Arfrever and I had
> discussed this before, so I was motivated. If it had been for (say)
> the client lib? Nah. I wouldn't have looked at it, and that is Not
> Good.

Agreed. But you still don't say *why* you wouldn't have looked at it
(what made reading it hard).

Daniel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-22 07:28:30 CEST