hehe... Yup. Stupid iPhone and it's little screen :-P
On Sep 10, 2008, at 18:20, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:11:29PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> The behavior described at the end seems acceptable.
>>
>> I could also argue that a conflict should occur at update time.
>> You're
>> trying to delete r1 of the file, but somebody bumped it to r2. Maybe
>> you *want* r2. As far as you know, maybe somebody else did the
>> delete/
>> replace, and so you just want to revert your local work.
>
> Was this message by chance destined for the "How should
> update-over-replace behave?" thread, and not this thread?
>
> Stefan
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2008, at 17:42, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
>>>> Your previous suggested log message would make a great code
>>>> comment.
>>>
>>> That was exactly what I said in IRC to Paul too. Paul, just so you
>>> know, Mike and I didn't rehearse that!
>>>
>>>> Your current suggestion makes the Whole World A Better Place To
>>>> Live.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> ---
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-11 00:25:14 CEST