On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:11:29PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> The behavior described at the end seems acceptable.
>
> I could also argue that a conflict should occur at update time. You're
> trying to delete r1 of the file, but somebody bumped it to r2. Maybe
> you *want* r2. As far as you know, maybe somebody else did the delete/
> replace, and so you just want to revert your local work.
Was this message by chance destined for the "How should
update-over-replace behave?" thread, and not this thread?
Stefan
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 17:42, Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_red-bean.com> wrote:
>
> > "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
> >> Your previous suggested log message would make a great code comment.
> >
> > That was exactly what I said in IRC to Paul too. Paul, just so you
> > know, Mike and I didn't rehearse that!
> >
> >> Your current suggestion makes the Whole World A Better Place To Live.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-09-11 00:21:16 CEST