Re: svn commit: r32487 - in branches/issue-2843-dev/subversion: libsvn_client libsvn_wc

"Rui, Guo" <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> writes:
>> Isn't that the opposite of what we want?
>
> The purpose of this test is to catch mising/hidden items before we do the
> actual copy. Both your condition and mine do not cover all the cases. A better
> one should like this:
> (target_entry &&
> (!target_entry->deleted ||
> (target_entry->schedule == add/replace)))

So we don't use target_entry->absent at all?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-28 19:17:30 CEST