[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Releasing 1.6

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:04:09 +0200

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:27:00PM -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Folks, this entire thread is missing the point:
> The question before us is whether there is benefit to the project in
> having them do that from a branch in the repository (or, more properly,
> in having certain committers maintain a branch in the repository from
> which CollabNet will make some binaries).
> _That_ is the topic under discussion.

That, plus the proposed alternative of us doing an early 1.6.
The proposal of which made this thread go to dev@, see subject :)

> Discussing whether or not a company should build custom binaries and
> hand them out to certain customers is another topic, for another thread.
> If we want to discuss that, let's please do it in a separate thread, and
> keep in mind that whatever we say there is purely advisory. This is
> open source software. Freedom, freedom, freedom :-). 'Nuff said.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-08 19:04:26 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.