Re: [PATCH] remove unused parameter from libsvn_client/copy.c:setup_copy()
From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:20:35 +0200
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:49:00PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
You're right, the behaviour of the affected functions was
But does "behaviour-compatible" equal "binary-compatible"?
> To be on the safe side I would say we have introduced a regression in
Fine by me, but I'd like to hear other peoples' opinions on this, too.
> Can you see if it would be much work to do that?
I don't know. I have not looked at the code in detail, I was just
So, to summarise, we're seeing two issues here:
* The API docs for svn_client_copy5 are flat out wrong with respect
* The behaviour of svn_client_copy4/3/2/1 has been retroactively
Right?
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.