Re: One line patch for Korean translation (ko.po)
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:54:53 +0300 (Jerusalem Daylight Time)
Jens Seidel wrote on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 at 15:20 +0200:
Presumably because these other teams won't apply a change before it has
@@ -17,1 +17,2 @@
patches --- they know the patches won't be applied before being read by
> If the previous translator will be active again he should check the
There is a rule that says you shouldn't commit a change just because you
Voting +1 on a change doesn't just mean you approve of it in principle.
and (IMHO) it applies equally to committing and to voting.
>
Personally, I think you should not have committed r32303:r32306, and
Then, if Kang Jeong-Hee wants to maintain the Korean translation, we
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.