Re: Merge and reverse merge dont seem to cancel out

[Paul Burba]
> Just to be clear, this is the use case we are talking about right?
>
> 1) Merge -rX:Y SOURCE WC_TARGET
>
> Some subtrees are added under WC_TARGET.
>
> No commit!
>
> 2) Reverse merge -c-N SOURCE WC_TARGET
>
> Where X <= N <= Y
> N is the revision responsible for some/all
> of the subtree adds.
>
> --force isn't used so the subtrees in question are
> skipped and remain scheduled for addition.

Correct. I don't know that it's _necessary_ to support this, but I
think it is something people will try to do.

-- 
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org