Re: [HEADS-UP] Need more backports to 1.5.0? (was: Re: you're going to kill me, but... [Re: svn commit: r31625 -) branches/1.5.x]

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 04:58:06PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:36:03PM -0700, David Glasser wrote:
> >> Not that I oppose backporting r31223, but there's a difference
> >> between
> >> "crashes instead of throwing an error message on bad input" and
> >> "breaks any program that tries to commit over the repos layer if
> >> there's a start-commit hook".
> >
> > You're right.
> > I'm OK with backporting the (r31620, r31622) group only, and
> > scheduling r312
>
> +1 from me too.

Done in r31653.

Stefan