[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Yet more DAV bugs

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:05:19 -0700

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:57 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> I assume you mean, "the drawback and penalty of using ra_neon today".
> ra_serf doesn't win here on any particular design merits -- it just
> implements a propfind cache of the same variety that ra_neon could (and
> should), too, right?

I don't think it'd be feasible to implement a similar cache at the
ra_neon layer as Neon hides too much of the underlying WebDAV
interactions to just plug in a true property cache. So, it'd only be
partially effective at best and be a nightmare to hook in, IMO. You'd
probably need to rewrite large chunks of neon to do it right. --

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-28 22:05:51 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.