Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:35 AM, <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>> Haven't had time to look into it any more, and it might just be a neon
>> issue anyway... (This was with 1.4.6, but I'm pretty sure 1.5 rc5 with
>> a newer neon was the same)
> This is the drawback and penalty of using ra_neon. ra_serf is likely
> a *lot* smarter about not repeating the same requests (esp. PROPFIND).
> -- justin
I assume you mean, "the drawback and penalty of using ra_neon today".
ra_serf doesn't win here on any particular design merits -- it just
implements a propfind cache of the same variety that ra_neon could (and
should), too, right?
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2008-05-28 20:57:42 CEST