Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta_at_gmail.com> writes:
> 2008-05-21 20:10:51 Mark Phippard napisał(a):
>> Have we reached any consensus or made a decision on the release? I
>> think the conversation has stalled but maybe it has continued off
>> list. It seems like we have these options available:
>>
>> 1) Release 1.5 the week of June 2 based on current RC5
>>
>> 2) Release RC6 next week based on a new branch from RC5 + selected
>> safe fixes and API changes. GA to follow by a week.
>>
>> 3) Release RC6 next week based on current branch and start a new soak period.
>>
>> I am not in favor of #3 if we are talking about a full 4-week soak.
>> I'd be OK with 2 weeks, in fact that option would be my personal
>> preference.
>
> +1 to 3) with a 2 week soak.
+0, meaning:
I'll be comfortable with it *if* the non-trivial changes merged since
RC5 (I've listed them out in other mails) get some extra review, and if
we make a concerted push on users@ and wherever else we can to get
people to test this in production, and to solicit feedback from them.
As for the review, I'm trying to do that myself, hope others join. We
don't have a system for noticing when people do a review (was just
talking with Jon Trowbridge about how that would be nice, but that's for
another time), so maybe just post here when you review a change, to say
"I looked at it".
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-05-21 23:03:40 CEST