Re: LGPL license violation (Neon) on Windows

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Brian Behlendorf <brian_at_collab.net> wrote:

> Now it *does* appear that svn-win32-1.4.6_dev.zip has neon as a separate
> library, lib/neon/libneon.lib. But it's not separate in
> svn-win32-1.4.6_javahl.zip. Libintl for win32 is separately distributed, the
> safest thing to do, but it looks like subclipse's zipfile has intl3_svn.dll
> included, similarly without any documentation or licensing info. The JavaHL
> Win32 zipfile also appears to include SVNKit, but no licensing information
> is provided for it.

The JavaHL zip file is not a standalone entity. All of the bindings
zip files are designed to be unzipped over the main zip file. Also,
the JavaHL zip file does not contain SVNKit. Brian had asked me this
off line and I did not get a chance to answer him. He saw a class
named SVNClient and thought that was from SVNKit. That is actually
the main JavaHL class file.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org