C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> * r30963: Not technically a blocker, but a pretty big performance
>>>> booster. Would be nice to have.
>>>>
>>> Mark and I will look at this.
>>
>> I tested this pretty thoroughly on his branch and am in favor of it.
>> However, it does not merge cleanly to 1.5.x and requires a backport
>> branch.
>
> Backport branch r30963-1.5.x created. I "had to" merge several little
> code formatting and comment-tweak revisions to get a clean merge, but
> once done, all was well.
>
STATUS currently has the following votes for this group. I'll cut RC 5
after we get another full +1.
Votes:
+1: cmpilato, hwright
+0: markphip (r30963-64 only; +1, but revs don't merge clean)
-Hyrum
Received on 2008-05-03 16:44:36 CEST