Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 at 19:41 +0200:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:52:29PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Karl Fogel wrote on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 at 12:23 -0400:
> > > I'm assuming we considered other possibilities and decided "^" was still
> > > the best character available. If so, then we just need to document the
> > > above and live with it.
> > >
> >
> > Maybe ':' or '@' ?
>
> Daniel,
>
> The threads discussing this feature are enormous, which leads me
> to assume that quite a bit of thought has gone into this.
>
> One thread I could find starts here:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=dev&msgNo=131499
> but it seems not to be the only one where the character was discussed.
>
> Note that the thread is over half a year old! So please let's not roll
> this discussion back up from the beginning without thorough research
> about why and how the decision for '^' was made.
>
> (I use zsh, too.)
>
Sorry for reopening this. I read at last one such enormous thread, and as
far as I remember ':' wasn't suggested there. That's why I suggested it
now (I should have said so explicitly).
But you're right, obviously. My logic is flawed -- it has already been
decided, so without a good reason it shouldn't be reopened.
Thanks,
Daniel
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-29 19:47:52 CEST