[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Fix --depth behavior for svn add (Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?)

From: David Glasser <glasser_at_davidglasser.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:41:54 -0700

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Rui, Guo <timmyguo_at_mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
> Take the greek tree as an example. Consider a wc with directory A at
> immediates and revision 1. And somebody introduced items A/D/new1 and
> A/B/E/new_tree at revision 2. When we update our wc from revision 1 to 2, we
> will notice the skipped new item A/D/new1 but not the A/B/E/new_tree. The idea
> is that, if we include a directory in wc (a leaf directory in wc), we should
> be able to see what happens (piratical) to it and probably would like to. If
> we didn't bother to include the directory in wc, we are probably not
> interested at all.

It sounds like what you're describing is a variant of the wc crawler
that goes one level deeper than the ambient depth.


David Glasser | glasser@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-29 19:42:14 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.