[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Re: Semantics of --depth: should define WC-depth for omitted-items?

From: Senthil Kumaran S <senthil_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:43:42 +0530

Hi Rui,

Rui, Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:37:01AM +0800, Rui, Guo wrote:
> * subversion/tests/cmdline/depth_tests.py
> (pull_in_tree_with_depth_option): New, pull in directory A with
> --depth=immediates, expected to see the depth of A is set to immediates

Applied in r30673 with some formatting tweaks.

> (depth_fold_expand_clean_trees): Fix a silly bug caused by copy/paste.
> The last expected_status assignment should be expected_disk.

Applied in r30672.

PS: When you add new test cases, add it at the end of all the existing test
cases which will be easy to refer the test cases by some number x at any point
of time.

Thank You.

-- 
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-18 14:14:00 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.