[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.5.0-rc1 up for signing/testing

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:53:20 -0400

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I tested
>>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.5.0-rc1/buda-oak/subversion-1.5.0-rc1.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> and
>>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.5.0-rc1/buda-oak/subversion-deps-1.5.0-rc1.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> in the following scenarios,
>>>
>>> make check, svnserveautocheck over bdb and fsfs - No issues found.
>>> make davautocheck (neon default) over bdb and fsfs - No issues found.
>>> make davautocheck HTTP_LIBRARY=serf over bdb and fsfs - update_tests.py
>>> 41 fails.
>>
>> Kamesh, your signature is your signature, of course, but does it not
>> bother you that 41 update tests are failing?
>
> Is serf still considered "experimental"? If so, should we 1) be testing
> it, and 2) block on test failures in ra_serf?

Yes, 1) yes, and 2) perhaps not, but there's not much point in being
experimental if all the experiments fail. :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2008-04-08 15:53:32 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.