Re: 1.5.0-rc1 up for signing/testing

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I tested
>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.5.0-rc1/buda-oak/subversion-1.5.0-rc1.tar.bz2
>>
>> and
>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.5.0-rc1/buda-oak/subversion-deps-1.5.0-rc1.tar.bz2
>>
>> in the following scenarios,
>>
>> make check, svnserveautocheck over bdb and fsfs - No issues found.
>> make davautocheck (neon default) over bdb and fsfs - No issues found.
>> make davautocheck HTTP_LIBRARY=serf over bdb and fsfs - update_tests.py
>> 41 fails.
>
> Kamesh, your signature is your signature, of course, but does it not
> bother you that 41 update tests are failing?

Is serf still considered "experimental"? If so, should we 1) be testing
it, and 2) block on test failures in ra_serf?

This isn't an argument for either, I just don't remember if we've
answered the question before.

-Hyrum