On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, as we already have this with wc-1.0, I felt it would be too
> restrictive to require it upfront. Unfortunately an older version of
> this document had a sentence stating "Not a goal per se, but nice if
> we can achieve them none the less."; that sentence seems to have been
> lost.
I'm not sure what you mean by that first sentence. How does the fact
that we do have the feature in 1.0 imply that it would be too
restrictive to require it in the new version? Do you mean to say that
we don't have it in 1.0, thus we shouldn't require it in a new
version? That seems incorrect, AFAIK we do have it in 1.0, unless you
mean something different by "shared working copy" than I do...
> If we can create a design which fills in all the requirements *and*
> can satisfy the 'multiple users per WC' requirement, I'm all for it!
>
> If you don't mind me asking: do you have any recollection of which
> committers that might have been?
>
> I hope this answers your question(s).
I believe Justin and Sander put some effort into making it work so
that we could use shared working copies to serve up web content for
apache.org. You need to allow multiple people to cd into the
directories and update them.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-11 20:26:36 CET