On 3/11/08, Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 6:58 PM, <dionisos_at_tigris.org> wrote:
>
> > +Non-goals
> > +=========
> > +
> > + * Multiple users with a single working copy (aka shared working copy)
> > + * Off-line commits
> > + * Distributed VC
>
> Any particular reason that shared working copies are not on the list
> of goals? I know a bunch of work was done to make it possible for
> multiple users to use the current working copy format, specifically
> because some committers had use cases that required that ability.
Well, as we already have this with wc-1.0, I felt it would be too
restrictive to require it upfront. Unfortunately an older version of
this document had a sentence stating "Not a goal per se, but nice if
we can achieve them none the less."; that sentence seems to have been
lost.
If we can create a design which fills in all the requirements *and*
can satisfy the 'multiple users per WC' requirement, I'm all for it!
If you don't mind me asking: do you have any recollection of which
committers that might have been?
I hope this answers your question(s).
Bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-03-11 16:54:56 CET