Karl Fogel wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> writes:
>
>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org> writes:
>>>
>>>>> This is the one part of the change I worry about: the addition of the
>>>>> "-all" suffix to in the 'mine' and 'theirs' cases can make that prompt
>>>>> go longer than 80 columns:
>>>>>
>>>>> Select: (p)ostpone, (M)ine-all, (T)heirs-all, (r)esolved, (h)elp for more options:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, these "all" options are not going to be here much longer,
>>>> right? They'll be relegated to "more options" once we have the
>>>> new mine/theirs. So why worry about it?
>>>>
>>> Yes, that's true. But 1.6 isn't happening tomorrow, either; I think
>>> it's worth paying attention to presentation for as long as 1.5.x is
>>> the latest.
>>>
>> With all the translations that have to deal with this, I'd say this is
>> trivial. Also I think we should have an .po file for English because
>> it's easier to fix typos and things in a translation than in the code.
>>
>
> I'm not sure which way you're advocating, Brane. The first half of
> your first sentence seems to contradict the second (but I might be
> misunderstanding). And I'm not sure what the second sentence has to
> do with the general topic of this thread, although it's an interesting
> idea in its own right.
>
> ??
>
Mrgfl, i should get more sleep.
"Don't worry about the 80-column limit too much here"
"Off-topic: we could tweak such things in message catalogs if we had an
en.po"
Sorry.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-02-05 17:44:54 CET