Re: mo' betta notification?

On Dec 28, 2007 9:54 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> David Glasser wrote:
> > Mike, for the mo' betta merge, should there be a " U" notification on
> > the root of the merge, for the mergeinfo change? There doesn't seem
> > to be now (if the *only* change to mergeinfo is from the record-only
> > merges).
>
> My understanding was that we didn't print the ' U' when the propchanges made
> were manufactured client-side. In other words, if the delta editor drive of
> a merge modified the svn:mergeinfo property (or any other property), we'd
> print the ' U' notification. But if it did not, and the only change to that
> property was due to the client libraries fiddling with it post-merge, we'd
> not print a notification.

Ah, that makes sense.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org